As gas boilers are gradually phased out and new builds face increasing restrictions, consumers are turning to alternative heating methods. One of the most popular options is the Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP). These systems operate similarly to a refrigerator but in reverse. They are favored for their relatively low installation costs and efficiency. However, there are some drawbacks:
Higher Running Costs: ASHPs tend to be more expensive to operate due to their high electricity consumption.
Space Requirements: They require a large water tank and a bulky outdoor compressor, which must be placed in a well-ventilated area.
Lower Heat Output: The heat output is lower compared to traditional systems, necessitating the use of either underfloor heating (UFH) or larger radiators.
Another popular alternative is the Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP). These systems offer excellent running costs, with efficiency rates reaching up to 400% in some cases. However, they come with significant drawbacks:
High Installation Costs: Installation can be expensive and varies depending on your location.
Disruption: Installing a GSHP requires significant ground excavation, which can be highly disruptive.
Lower Heat Output: Like ASHPs, GSHPs also have lower heat output, making UFH or larger radiators necessary.
Infrared heating panels are another option for home heating. These systems are space-efficient, easy to install, low-maintenance, and more efficient than traditional central heating. They can even be connected to solar panels. However, they are expensive to purchase and cannot fully replace a boiler, as they do not provide hot water.
Solar heating is also an option to consider.
Comments